The Baptism of the Holy Spirit
Revivals have always played an interesting part in the Church. Ever since the days of Moses, the Judges, the various kings of both kingdoms and even the days of the prophets and others like Ezra and Nehemiah and even Pentecost revivals have been a key aspect to God’s heart for mankind. Yet revivals did not stop with the closing of the cannon, we have seen revivals all the way up to today, and will continue to see them as history unfolds; one of the climaxes of history will be that of widespread revival (Revelation 11:13). Yet before we move to deep into whether or not revivals happen today we should start by defining revival. From there we will look at some of the common characteristics of revival, and even at how revivals have effected and played a part on our lives today; even if we are unaware of them.
Revival is not solely a Christian term, the dictionary simply defines revival as a noun: “restoration to life, consciousness, vigor, strength, etc.” In other words it is simply a ‘renewal.’ In the Christian context many have constrained it to be “an awakening, in a church or community, of interest in and care for matters relating to personal religion,” or “an evangelistic service or a series of services for the purpose of effecting a religious awakening: to hold a revival.” These begin to paint a decent picture of revival, yet they still lack an aspect that is key to revival. In the book of Acts Jesus declares that:
“… you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit comes upon you; and you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.” (Acts 1:8)
Yet what was Pentecost? Was it really revival? When we look at the ‘Church’ (Which at this time was Israel) we see that, to say the least, they had missed the mark. God called Israel to be a light to the nations (Isa 51:4, 60:3) they were to be the ones who led the nations to God, yet they kept it to themselves. To such an extent that they developed a spirit of religiosity and out came the Pharisees. Israel had missed the mark, they were able to use God for their will instead of living out God’s will. Revival was long over due; revolution was now needed.
Revivals come and go. They are ‘seasons,’ points in time where God came, showed up, and moved. People caught the fire and they repented and turned back to God. Yet they let it slip away over time; “Israel served the LORD all the days of Joshua and all the days of the elders that outlived Joshua, who had known the works of the LORD which He had done for Israel…. Thus the children of Israel dwelt among the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites. And they took their daughters to be their wives, and gave their daughters to their sons; and they served their gods. So the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord. They forgot the LORD their God and they served the Baals and Asherahs.” (Joshua 24:31; Judges 3:5-7). “And the children of Israel again did evil in the sight of the LORD. So the LORD strengthened Eglon king of Moab against Israel….” (Judges 3:12) “But when the children of Israel cried out to the LORD, the LORD raised up a deliverer….” (Judges 3:15). These were revivals; Israel became a revival addict. They constantly fell away (Judges 4:1-2; 6:1; 8:33-35; 10:6; 13:1) eventually followed by times of revival (Judges 4:3; 6:7; 10:1; 10:11-16; 16:28-30). We can take a few things away from the book of Judges in regards to revival. The first and most obvious is that the Israelites repeatedly lost sight of Yahweh, they fell away, only to then return in a time of revival to their first love. The second trend we see is a little more subtle: Each season of revival was spread further and further apart; each time the Israelites fell into captivity it took them longer and longer to repent and cry out to God. This became so bad that the last account of revival was contained to a single man Samson (10:11-16). After this last break of oppression there were no judges to lead Israel in the way of the LORD (Samson’s act of redeeming Israel led to a martyred death for his peoples freedom) “In those days there was no king in Israel…” (Judges 18:1). The people were so wrapped up in the culture of the Philistines that even though God had come to their rescue they didn’t really know where to go from there; revival had become mundane, they needed revolution.
Revolution: from Late Latin revolūtiō, revolūtiōn-, from Latin revolūtus, past participle of revolvere, to turn over;
{rev·o·lu·tion}
noun—
“a radical and pervasive change in society and the social structure, esp. one made suddenly;” “a sudden, complete or marked change in something;” “The overthrow of one government and its replacement with another;” “A fundamental change in political organization, or in a government or constitution; the overthrow or renunciation of one government, and the substitution of another, by the governed.”
Revolution is, in its essence: a change of lifestyle, a new order of existence”. Israel had fallen into a spirit of religiosity and had settled normality. Kings came and went, the people turned back to God and then back to the days of Noah. The prophets cried out… yet to no avail. In 722BC the Assyrians invaded the Northern kingdoms and led them off into exile. The unfaithfulness of Israel eventually led to their exile… and yet the prophets continued to cry out. Yet still Judah did not learn from the Northern Kingdoms, nor did they take heed of the prophets words, and followed the Northern Kingdom into exile in 586BC by the power of the Babylonian Empire. And still the prophets cried out… and cried out… and eventually someone heard their cry and Nehemiah responded to the LORD’s will and returned to the LORD’s promises. They rebuilt the wall, and eventually the Temple. Nehemiah brought about revival and the people returned to Yahweh. The years passed and scilence settled in, and with it so did the hearts of the Israelites. They settled into their homes and into their culture. They settled into religiosity, and revival was yet again due. This time though it would come in a different way than ever before.
“He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him…. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld His glory….”
(John 1:10-14)
God was to not only bring about revival, He was going to bring about revolution. Nor was He going to raise up a judge, a king, or even a prophet to accomplish it. Revival which was fulled by men had failed over and over, the time had come that revolution was the only path left, and for that He Himself “…became flesh and dwelt among us and[/that] we [might] behold His glory, the glory of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.” (John 1:14). Revolution must be God’s doing. God brought about a change of lifestyle for the Jews, a new order of existence: The Church. The climatic birthday of this revolution was to then fall on the 50th day after Easter Sunday, just ten days after Jesus ascended back to the Father “Whn the Day of Pentecost had fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. And suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a rushing wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting.” (Acts 2:1-2 emphasis mine). Not only is revival a Biblical reality, it is in a sense the very foundation of what we (as the Church) stand on. Pentecost was the fullest form of revival the Church had ever experienced, it was the beginning of a new order of existence for God’s people: Life with the Holy Spirit.
To many this appears to be the greatest thing that the Church ever underwent as a body (Jesus was the best thing that ever happened), it was definitely what made the Pentecostal unique. Yet even from the beginning of the Church’s days we see that revival has never been fully accepted, “So they were all amazed and perplexed, saying to one another, ‘whatever cold this mean?’ Others mocking said ‘They are full of wine’” (Acts 2:12-13 emphasis added). Since the first day the Spirit fell it has been rejected by others all around. These men speaking in tongues and working healings were thought to not only be odd but drunk and many people rejected what they had.
So was this it? Was Pentecost the last revival? It was, as much as their generation was the last generation. One only has to look at our modern American cultural context to realize that we too are in desperate need of not only revival but revolution. When we look at the Church over time it is marked with seasons of revival and milestones of revolution (Just because revolution is a complete turn of events does not mean we have come to the completion of God’s desired will or plan for humanity). We see that the Church under went many revivals as the gospel continued to spread to new areas, but following all of these revivals the Church continued to fall back asleep (back into the religiosity from which Christ had saved it through the living of His life and the outpouring of His Spirit). So naturally revolutions sprang up: Luther and his 95 thesis’ in 1517. Here is one of the clearest depictions of revolution in the Post-Pentecost days of the Church. The Church had fallen so asleep and wondered so off track under the leadership of people such as Constantine and other various leaders of ‘The Church’ that eventually revival was no longer a solution, the only solution was revolution, and revolution Luther brought. Many still did not wish to embrace this revolution either as is clear from his excommunication at the Diet of Worms after a little quarrel with the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. Throughout time revivals have never been quite warmly accepted.
Revolutions happened, but what about revivals? Where revolutions seem to only come every so ever long apart, revivals seem to pop up in pockets much more frequently. With globalization we have even come to the point where it appears revival is almost continuous even if it is still not consistent. The first effect of globalization that has caused this is population explosion. So many more people are alive today that naturally more are crying out and seeking God. The second is the technological revolution. Due to this revolution we not only hear more about revival no than ever before, but people are actually able to gather together all over the globe to cry out to God. Revivals have always seemed to come to pass after seasons of desporation. Culture declines to such a point that people eventually come to the point of ‘enough.’ Jesus compares the end times to the days of Noah, where there is drinking and adultery and all other trends of the world. Revivals thus seem to occur once the people remember and return to God’s love. The book of Hosea becomes a perfect illustration of revival. Not only do we, God’s people begin to cry out to God, but God too returns to His people and lavishes His love on them. There are many things that begin to happen when people begin to contend for revival; for the apostles a few signs of revival were boldness and power. Yet the most common sign that revival produces is compassion. This theme is especially common in Pentecostal revivals. Pentecostal revivals tend to be unique from many other denominational revivals because of their desperate compassion. Pentecostal revivals focus more around others than themselves, they are brought to a place of revival due to their desire to share their love with others. Over and over again Jesus was moved by compassion for the multitudes; Peter was moved with compassion for those in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost.
Over time the spreading of Christianity began to slow down, especially as the Roman Catholic Church became more and more inner focused, almost to the point of zero growth in the aspect of world evangelism. When the Pentecostal movement stepped onto the stage this is one area that changed. Pentecostals quickly began to pick up a heart for the nations. They believed that Jesus’ words were to be taken literally, that they really were to go into all Jerusalem and Samaria and to the ends of the Earth.’ The Pentecostals had compassion for the lost, for the nations. They had had enough of focusing on themselves, on the papacy and were ready to go out into all the earth.
Jesus commanded His disciples to “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and the Holy Spirit….” (Matthew 2819) and again in Acts: “He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the Promise of the Father, ‘which you have heard from Me’ for John truly baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now” (Acts 1:4-5). Not only does Jesus believe in the need of the Holy Spirit, but He believed that it was essential. It remains in his closing comments (and throughout His teachings) as an essential aspect to the life of a follower. So essential that in John 16:7 Jesus says that it is to our advantage that He leave so the Holy Spirit might abide with us. In a sense Jesus knew that He was bound by His human body and could not therefore touch as many people as the Church could through the Holy Spirit. Jesus embodied God and modeled a life that we are called to follow, one of boldness, authority, purity, power ect. Yet with the Holy Spirit’s indwelling the Church becomes the physical vessel God has decided to use to reach the world. Yet even with Jesus’ commands we see still that many people were not welcoming of the Holy Spirit (as mentioned earlier, or see Acts 2:13).
Many welcomed Jesus and His teachings on the Holy Spirit, yet still many quarreled over the implications then of what all this meant to be baptized and saved and much else, but lets just stay here with these two. The word Baptized literally means to be submerged, or covered from all sides and angles. The baptism of the Holy Spirit is thus to be covered or completely submerged in the Spirit of God (Acts 2:4), and for the disciples it came on with power and boldness, tongues of fire (Acts 2:14 3 respectively). If you have ever been present when people receive God as their Savior you probably have witnessed (or not witnessed) that fire didn’t fall upon all. In Acts 2:41 Luke states that around 3,000 people joined the Church that day and were baptized (by water or the Spirit it does not say). Yet the exact following verses state that “… fear came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were done through the apostles.” (Acts 2:43 emphasis mine). Simply because these 3,000 did not start moving in the obvious activation of the Holy Spirit did not mean that He did not tabernacle within them. Remember the word baptism means to be submerged within, these 3,000 were baptized; they were submerged.
Yet some would claim that this is simply because that Holy Spirit only came in particular times of power; Acts 4:8 states that “Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them….” yet in the English literary practices this connotates more of a passive description rather than an overtaking action. We might not always feel the Spirit within us, but He is still there. Jesus said “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth…. and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:18-20). We have the authority of Jesus within us. This is only so because we have the Holy Spirit within us. Just because we do not feel Him does not mean He is not there, “… I am with you always….” (Matthew 28:20). Oddly the word always means forever, without leaving. We might operate in the Spirit more obviously from time, but even when we don’t feel Him, He is still there, and we still stand in that authority.